Lindenwood University to Cut 10 Athletic Teams, Impacting 284 Student-Athletes

The decision to eliminate nine Division I programs and one Student Life Sports program comes as Lindenwood University aims to sustain the quality of the student experience.

Lindenwood University in St. Charles, Missouri, made a significant announcement on Friday, revealing its plans to cut 10 athletic teams, including nine Division I programs. The decision was prompted by the university’s realization that the athletic department had become too large to maintain the expected standard of the student experience. While this move aims to align the athletics department with its peers, it also means that numerous student-athletes will no longer have the opportunity to compete in the sports they love while at Lindenwood.

The NCAA Sports Being Cut

Men’s Lacrosse, Men’s Swimming and Diving, Men’s Tennis, Men’s Indoor Track & Field, Men’s Outdoor Track & Field, Men’s Wrestling, Women’s Field Hockey, Women’s Gymnastics, and Women’s Swimming and Diving are the nine Division I programs that will be eliminated. Additionally, the men’s and women’s cycling program, which falls under the university’s Student Life Sports department but does not compete in NCAA competition, will also be cut.

Immediate and Gradual Phasing Out

The women’s field hockey program has been discontinued with immediate effect, as they competed during the fall semester. However, the remaining sports will be phased out following their spring 2024 seasons. This timeline allows the affected student-athletes to complete their current academic year and gives them the opportunity to explore other options for continuing their athletic pursuits.

Impact on Student-Athletes

The decision to cut these athletic teams will have a direct impact on approximately 284 student-athletes at Lindenwood University. Recognizing the significance of this decision, the university has committed to honoring scholarships for the affected student-athletes throughout their undergraduate education. Additionally, those who have already signed letters of intent will have their scholarships upheld.

Vice President for Intercollegiate Athletics, Jason Coomer, expressed empathy for the student-athletes and acknowledged the difficulty of this decision. He emphasized the necessity of aligning the athletics department with the university’s long-term sustainability goals, even though it comes at the expense of the student-athletes’ opportunities to compete in their respective sports.

Ensuring Long-Term Sustainability

Lindenwood University’s move to reduce the size of its athletics department is driven by the need to ensure the long-term sustainability of the program. By aligning itself with peer institutions, the university aims to maintain the quality of the student experience while also managing its resources effectively. This decision reflects a broader trend among universities and colleges that are reevaluating their athletic programs to adapt to changing financial landscapes and evolving priorities.

Honoring Commitment to Student-Athletes

While the elimination of these athletic teams is undoubtedly disappointing for the student-athletes involved, Lindenwood University is demonstrating its commitment to supporting them during this transition. By honoring scholarships and providing opportunities for affected student-athletes to continue their education, the university is striving to mitigate the impact of this decision.

Conclusion:

Lindenwood University’s decision to cut 10 athletic teams, including nine Division I programs, is a strategic move aimed at aligning its athletics department with peer institutions. While this decision will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the affected student-athletes, the university has committed to honoring scholarships and supporting them throughout their undergraduate education. As universities navigate financial challenges and prioritize sustainability, difficult decisions like these are becoming increasingly common. The story of Lindenwood University’s athletic program cuts serves as a reminder of the complex considerations that institutions must grapple with to ensure the long-term viability of their athletic departments.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *