Meteorologists and climatologists in conservative states face resistance and hostility when communicating climate change.
Meteorologists and climatologists play a crucial role in educating the public about climate change. However, in conservative states, they often encounter strong resistance and skepticism. This article explores the challenges faced by these professionals and the impact it has on their careers and mental well-being. It also highlights the importance of climate change reporting and the positive reception it receives from the majority of Americans.
The Pushback in Iowa
Chris Gloninger, a seasoned meteorologist, experienced a wave of negative feedback when he started his job as chief meteorologist at KCCI in Des Moines, Iowa. Despite his extensive experience and a successful climate change series in Boston, Gloninger faced criticism for “politicizing the weather” and promoting “liberal conspiracy theories.” The situation escalated when he began receiving harassing emails, prompting him to install a security system and seek protection from KCCI. The threats took a toll on Gloninger’s mental health, eventually leading him to leave Iowa and focus on climate solutions.
The Importance of Trusted Sources
While resistance to climate change science exists, surveys indicate that 90% of Americans are open to learning about climate change. Ed Maibach from the Center for Climate Change Communication emphasizes the significance of trusted sources like meteorologists and climatologists in educating the public. He suggests that the perception of “red and blue states” hinders progress, as climate change education is possible even in conservative communities.
Jim Gandy’s Success Story
Jim Gandy, the first TV meteorologist to participate in the Climate Matters program, demonstrated the effectiveness of climate change reporting in conservative states. Despite living in a predominantly conservative area in South Carolina, Gandy’s audience embraced his reporting on local climate change impacts. The success of Climate Matters led to the program providing resources to meteorologists and journalists in 95% of U.S. media markets.
The Toll on Climate Communicators
Climatologists and meteorologists in conservative states often face skepticism and hostility when communicating climate change. Martha Durr, who recently stepped away from her role as the state climatologist in Nebraska, expressed exhaustion and frustration. Durr found herself acting as a therapist rather than a scientist, trying to navigate pre-existing opinions and resistance. The constant pushback and lack of progress led her to realize she no longer had the energy to continue the same message without seeing tangible solutions.
Conclusion:
The challenges faced by meteorologists and climatologists in conservative states highlight the uphill battle in climate change communication. While resistance exists, the majority of Americans are receptive to learning about climate change from trusted sources. The success of programs like Climate Matters demonstrates the importance of providing resources and support to professionals in this field. However, the toll on climate communicators cannot be ignored, as the constant pushback and lack of progress can lead to burnout. Moving forward, it is crucial to continue supporting and amplifying the voices of those working tirelessly to educate the public about climate change.
Leave a Reply