Dre and the WTF1 Talent team discuss controversial F1 takes and offer their perspectives on the hottest topics in the sport.
In this week’s episode of Hot Takes Wednesday, Dre and Sundaram, the F1 Stats Guru, dive into the spiciest Formula 1 opinions shared by fans. They analyze the validity of these takes and rate them on a scale of 1 to 5. Let’s explore some of the most intriguing opinions and see what the team has to say.
Take #1: “Vegas – The FIA should have made Max give the place back (after Lap 1)”
Dre argues that allowing teams to choose their own punishment for illegal overtakes creates a loophole that teams can exploit. He suggests that F1 should adopt the approach used in other series, such as MotoGP and IndyCar, where position drops are enforced. Dre rates this take with a 5.
Charley agrees, expressing dissatisfaction with the current rule that allows teams to determine their own punishment. She believes that Max Verstappen’s unintentional mistake should not have absolved him of giving the place back. Charley rates this take with a 5.
Hannah believes that a 5-second penalty was fair but suggests that swapping positions would have been a more immediate and impactful penalty. She rates this take with a 5.
Take #2: “Las Vegas is the best circuit on the calendar for racing. If the organizers were to work out the issues with the fan experience and adjust the ticket pricing, the event as a whole would be the best F1 Grand Prix altogether.”
Dre acknowledges the success of the Las Vegas Grand Prix, with a record-breaking attendance and an exciting race. However, he believes that the track needs further evaluation, logistical improvements, and traffic management to become a top-tier Grand Prix. Dre rates this take with a 3.
Charley disagrees, stating that while the race was enjoyable, it falls short of being the best Grand Prix due to the absence of a classic race track. She rates this take with a 2.
Hannah is tempted to agree, highlighting the potential of the Las Vegas Grand Prix to become one of the most anticipated races on the calendar. She acknowledges the need for improvements in the fan experience but rates this take with a 4.
Take #3: “The current season is not only too long for the drivers, but also too long for the fans.”
Dre expresses nostalgia for the days of shorter seasons and believes that the current trend of longer seasons is exhausting for everyone involved. He rates this take with a 4.
Charley shares the sentiment, missing the days of fewer races and suggesting that 20 races would be an ideal number in the modern era. She emphasizes the short gap between seasons as evidence that 24 races are too many. Charley rates this take with a 4.
Hannah, while understanding the challenges faced by drivers and teams, disagrees as a fan who eagerly awaits each race weekend. She suggests shortening the calendar by a few races to alleviate the strain on the participants. Hannah rates this take with a 2.
Conclusion:
On this episode of Hot Takes Wednesday: Extra Heat, Dre and the WTF1 Talent team delved into some of the most contentious F1 opinions. They provided their insights and ratings, sparking further discussion among fans. While opinions differed on various topics, it’s clear that the F1 community is passionate and engaged. Tune in next week for more scorching hot takes!
Leave a Reply