Allegations of misleading information and safety concerns surrounding self-driving cars have prompted discussions about the need for updated regulations and increased oversight.
The recent allegations that autonomous vehicle maker Cruise misled the DMV about an accident in San Francisco, resulting in a pedestrian being seriously injured, have raised concerns about the safety and regulation of self-driving cars. With hundreds of these vehicles currently being tested on California’s city streets, questions are being asked about their overall safety compared to human drivers and the need for new laws and watchdogs to govern their rapid expansion.
The Safety Debate Surrounding Self-Driving Cars
Many are still struggling to determine whether self-driving cars are indeed safer than human drivers. Irina Raicu, Director of the Internet Ethics program at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, points out that while these vehicles make fewer mistakes compared to human drivers, they also make new and interesting types of mistakes. The ongoing testing of self-driving cars on city streets alongside human drivers and pedestrians raises ethical concerns, as it feels like a mass experiment without proper consent.
The Double Standard in Law Enforcement
When self-driving cars violate traffic laws, there is little law enforcement can do. In California, traffic tickets can only be issued if there is an actual driver in the car. An internal memo from San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott states that no citation for a moving violation can be issued if the autonomous vehicle is being operated in a driverless mode. This lack of enforcement raises questions about fairness and the need for new laws to govern this evolving technology.
Contrasting Approaches: California vs. Texas
While California’s current transportation laws leave driverless vehicles immune from receiving traffic tickets for moving violations, Texas reformed its traffic laws in 2017 to allow ticketing of autonomous vehicles. According to the Texas Transportation Code, the owner of a driverless car is considered the operator and can be cited for breaking traffic laws, regardless of their physical presence in the vehicle. This contrast highlights the need for California to adapt its regulations to appropriately govern self-driving cars.
Industry Claims and Safety Standards
Autonomous vehicle makers claim that their cars need to continue logging miles to improve the technology and make them safer. Waymo Product Management Director Chris Ludwick asserts that Waymo’s fleet of driverless cars is already safer than human drivers, citing research that shows lower crash rates compared to human drivers. However, critics argue that the track record of self-driving cars is not yet sufficient, as human drivers cause one death per 100 million miles driven on average, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Calls for Increased Oversight and Regulation
Some lawmakers and experts believe that California needs to reassess how it regulates the self-driving car industry. Senator David Cortese has launched an investigation into the DMV’s permitting process for driverless car companies and is calling for new safety standards and regulations. Cortese suggests the creation of a new regulatory agency solely focused on driverless cars and artificial intelligence, similar to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), to strike the right balance between innovation and public safety.
Conclusion:
The recent allegations against Cruise and the ongoing safety concerns surrounding self-driving cars have ignited debates about the need for new laws and increased oversight. While autonomous vehicle makers claim their cars are safer than human drivers, the lack of enforcement and the evolving nature of the technology raise questions about fairness and public safety. As the industry continues to evolve, it is crucial for California to update its regulations and create a regulatory structure that reflects the advancements in self-driving technology.
Leave a Reply